CVE-2010-17144Patch

LOW

Signal is active with 1 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

  • Patch affected systems immediately

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

0.5/ 10 priority

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

AVAILABLE

Momentum

NONE

Threat summary

  • Patch or workaround signal is available
  • 1 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

  • Patch or workaround mentioned in 1 signal
  • Technical details provided in 1 signal
  • 1 total mentions across 1 day

Deep dive

Activity timeline1 mentions / 1d
00111Mentions · 2026-02-06: 1Patch / Workaround · 2026-02-06: 1Technical Details · 2026-02-06: 102-06
Signal classification1 categories
Patch
1100.0%
Full discourse1 post
  • zomboni@beameduplol
    Patch

    @Acquired_Savant @HackerxEth If you knew how to read code, you'd know that CVE-2010-17144 was a overflow bug that came from just... bad code. Satoshi-era code. CVE-2018-17144 was yet another instance of bad code. An optimization skipped a check thought to be redundant. Both patched in hours

    Post summary

    The tweet points out that both CVE‑2010‑17144 and CVE‑2018‑17144 stem from simple coding errors and notes that the vulnerabilities were patched within hours.

    0000034
    164 followersView on X

Explore more