CVE-2023-38277False Positive

LOW

Signal is active with 1 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

Back to dashboard

0.0/ 10 priority

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

NONE

Momentum

NONE

Threat summary

1 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

False Positive: 1 classified signal
1 total mentions across 1 day

Deep dive

Activity timeline1 mentions / 1d

Signal classification1 categories

False Positive

1100.0%

Referenced assets1 URL

By indicator

https://www.cybereason.com/blog/ttp-briefing-q4-2025

Full discourse1 post

jericho@attritionorg46d
False Positive
@cybereason re: https://www.cybereason.com/blog/ttp-briefing-q4-2025 You should really validate CVEs. "CVE-2023-399280" and two others have an extraneous 9. "CVE-2023-38277" should be 39277.
Post summary
The tweet corrects misstated CVE identifiers, implying the referenced CVEs are wrongly labeled and thus not valid vulnerabilities.
00000371
17.6K followersView on X

Explore more

Back to dashboard