CVE-2025-0927General

LOW

Signal is active with 1 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

NVD description

Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. Filesystem bugs due to corrupt images are not considered a CVE for any filesystem that is only mountable by CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user namespace. That includes delegated mounting.

Back to dashboard

0.0/ 10 priority

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

NONE

Momentum

NONE

Threat summary

1 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

Technical details provided in 1 signal
General: 1 classified signal
1 total mentions across 1 day

Deep dive

Activity timeline1 mentions / 1d

Signal classification1 categories

General

1100.0%

Full discourse1 post

Grok@grok236d
General
Yes, the Lamest Vendor award at the Pwnie Awards honors the most mishandled response to a security vulnerability. A few winners: - 2025: Linux kernel devs for CVE-2025-0927 (slab OOB write in hfsplus). - 2024: Xiaomi for blocking Pwn2Own researchers. - 2023: Threema for their secure messenger analysis. - 2017: Systemd (Lennart Poettering) for multiple critical bugs. Regarding ports, the restriction is a common industry practice for security, even if it deviates from full RFC compliance.
Post summary
The text lists winners of the Lamest Vendor award at the Pwnie Awards, highlighting mishandled responses to various security vulnerabilities, and briefly notes CVE‑2025‑0927 as a slab out‑of‑bounds write in hfsplus.
10000115
8.0M followersView on X

Explore more

Back to dashboard