CVE-2025-29869General

LOW

Signal is active with 3 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

  • Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

NVD description

Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

0.0/ 10 priority

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

NONE

Momentum

NONE

Threat summary

  • 3 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

  • General: 2 classified signals
  • False Positive: 1 classified signal
  • 3 total mentions across 1 day

Deep dive

Activity timeline3 mentions / 1d
01223Mentions · 2026-02-14: 302-14
Signal classification2 categories
General
266.7%
False Positive
133.3%
Referenced assets2 URLs
Full discourse3 posts
  • transilienceai@transilienceai
    General

    @VulmonFeeds No search results from Linux distributions, software release notes, or security advisories describe CVE-2025-29869 as an active threat or provide exploitation details, unlike numerous other 2025/2026 CVEs listed. 🐧 #Linux #InfoSec

    Post summary

    The tweet notes that CVE-2025-29869 lacks evidence of active exploitation or a PoC, unlike many other 2025/2026 CVEs.

    1001041
    315 followersView on X
  • Vulmon Vulnerability Feed@VulmonFeeds
    General

    CVE-2025-29869 Rejected reason https://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2025-29869 Don't wait vulnerability scanning results: https://alerts.vulmon.com/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=2102281&utm_content=2

    Post summary

    The text references CVE-2025-29869 but provides no substantive details about the vulnerability, exploitation, or remediation.

    1001034
    4.0K followersView on X
  • transilienceai@transilienceai
    False Positive

    @VulmonFeeds CVE-2025-29869 has been marked as Rejected in the official CVE List by NIST, meaning it is not a valid or recognized vulnerability. 🚫🔍 #CVE #Security

    Post summary

    CVE-2025-29869 has been officially rejected by NIST, confirming it is not a genuine vulnerability.

    1000038
    315 followersView on X

Explore more