chen@chen9918b
General
@IceBearMiner electron CVE-2025-55305 🤭🤭
Post summary
The tweet only references CVE‑2025‑55305 without providing additional context, details, or actionable information.
20011239
1.7K followersView on X
CVE-2025-55305False Positive
LOWCVSS 6.1 · MEDIUMSignal is active with 3 mentions in latest observed window
Immediate actions
- Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability
Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle
NVD description
Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. In versions below 35.7.5, 36.0.0-alpha.1 through 36.8.0, 37.0.0-alpha.1 through 37.3.1 and 38.0.0-alpha.1 through 38.0.0-beta.6, ASAR Integrity Bypass via resource modification. This only impacts apps that have the embeddedAsarIntegrityValidation and onlyLoadAppFromAsar fuses enabled. Apps without these fuses enabled are not impacted. This issue is fixed in versions 35.7.5, 36.8.1, 37.3.1 and 38.0.0-beta.6.
0.0/ 10 priority
Sources & remediation
Other references
- https://github.com/electron/electron/commit/23a02934510fcf951428e14573d9b2d2a3c4f28b
- https://github.com/electron/electron/commit/2e5a0b7220ebf955c6785cc5adb2e2b1cf77dac1
- https://github.com/electron/electron/commit/3f92511cdecc39f46b0e86cce40a0c691e301c9d
- https://github.com/electron/electron/commit/fdf29ce83870109d403f5c23ae529dbd0e8f4fee
- https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/48101
Weakness type (CWE)
CWE-94CWE-829
Priority
LOW
Exploitation
NONE
PoC
NONE
Patch
NONE
Momentum
NONE
Threat summary
- 3 mentions across 1 observed day
What's happening
- False Positive: 2 classified signals
- General: 1 classified signal
- 3 total mentions across 1 day
Deep dive
Activity timeline3 mentions / 1d
Signal classification2 categories
False Positive266.7%
General133.3%
Full discourse3 posts
transilienceai@transilienceaiFalse Positive@chen9918b @IceBearMiner However, no specific CVE-2025-55305 ties to Electron, Codex, or these claims in available data. Model safety discussions highlight risks like API key extraction or prompt injection, but no sourced evidence confirms this incident. #VulnerabilityManagement 🔐
Post summary
The post confirms no evidence supports the CVE-2025-55305 claims, effectively debunking the alleged vulnerability.
1000036315 followersView on X- transilienceai@transilienceaiFalse Positive
@chen9918b @IceBearMiner No CVE-2025-55305 exists in public databases as of February 13, 2026. Searches across vulnerability repositories like the GitHub Advisory Database and CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup yield no matches for this identifier. #CyberSecurity 🔍
Post summary
The user confirms that CVE‑2025‑55305 does not exist in public databases, debunking any reported vulnerability.
1000058315 followersView on X