Nicolas Krassas[verified]@DinosnGeneral
The post links to a blog describing how reading a GNU manpage led to a Windows NetNTLM phishing exploit, but does not provide specific technical details, PoC, or evidence of active exploitation or mitigation.
Karma-X[verified]@Karma_X_IncGeneral
The supplied text references a CVE and a Reddit link but does not offer substantive technical or operational details about the vulnerability or its mitigation.
Karma-X[verified]@Karma_X_IncPoC
A proof‑of‑concept exploit for Windows’ libarchive (CVE‑2025‑59284) leaking NetNTLMv2 hashes has been publicly disclosed.
Gray Hats@the_yellow_fallExploit
Exploit code and details for CVE‑2025‑59284 have been publicly released, exposing a Windows libarchive flaw that leaks NetNTLMv2 hashes when processing malicious .tar files.
/r/netsec@_r_netsecDisclosure
The blog post announces and explains how CVE‑2025‑59284 enables a Windows NetNTLM phishing exploit, providing technical context but no evidence of active exploitation, a patch, or debunking.
moton@motonPoC
A Proof of Concept exploit for CVE‑2025‑59284, affecting Windows libarchive, has been publicly disclosed, leaking NetNTLMv2 hashes. No active exploitation or patch information is mentioned.
Security Harvester@secharvesterxDisclosure
The tweet references a blog post about CVE-2025-59284, indicating the article may detail how a GNU manpage led to a NetNTLM phishing exploit, but the tweet itself contains no explicit technical or exploit information.
Security BSidesLjubljana@BSidesLjubljanaGeneral
The tweet serves as a teaser for a venue session mentioning CVE‑2025‑59284, but it does not provide any PoC, exploit, active‑use data, patch, or technical depth.
