CVE-2026-13505Disclosure

LOWCVSS 8.7 · HIGH

Signal is active with 3 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

  • Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

NVD description

In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series), sensitive key material held by the AES and DESede engines, the SP 800-90A DRBGs, SymmetricSecretKey and the PBKD and scrypt parameter classes was zeroised on garbage collection by overriding Object.finalize. Finalization runs at an unspecified time and in an unspecified order and is serviced by a single finalizer thread, so where objects carrying a finalizer are allocated faster than that thread retires them the pending-finalization queue grows without bound: disposal falls arbitrarily far behind, which can contribute to an OutOfMemoryError under load, and the key material those objects hold stays resident in the heap for as long as they are queued, defeating the purpose of the zeroisation. The behaviour was not a problem on Java 8 or Java 11; it is later JVMs, on which finalization has been deprecated and progressively de-emphasised, where it becomes one. Disposal of these classes now runs from a java.lang.ref.Cleaner registered in the multi-release jdk1.9 overlay, so on Java 9 and later it no longer depends on the finalizer being scheduled. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) and Bouncy Castle for Java LTS are not affected, as neither implements the finalizer-based zeroisation scheme.

0.0/ 10 priority

Sources & remediation

Weakness type (CWE)
CWE-772

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

NONE

Momentum

NONE

Threat summary

  • 3 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

  • Technical details provided in 2 signals
  • Disclosure: 2 classified signals
  • General: 1 classified signal
  • 3 total mentions across 1 day

Deep dive

Activity timeline3 mentions / 1d
01223Mentions · 2026-08-08: 3Technical Details · 2026-08-08: 208-08
Signal classification2 categories
Disclosure
266.7%
General
133.3%
Referenced assets3 URLs
Full discourse3 posts
  • CVE@CVEnew
    Disclosure

    CVE-2026-13505 In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series), sensitive key material held by the AES a… https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13505

    Post summary

    The text references CVE‑2026‑13505, a vulnerability in Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS where sensitive key material is improperly held by an AES implementation in older releases. Detailed information is available through the linked CVE record.

    010001.0K
    57.9K followersView on X
  • CyberSignal | Cybersecurity News@XQOPTRX
    Disclosure

    🔐 Bouncy Castle flaw may leave crypto keys in memory A new high-severity issue, CVE-2026-13505, affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS. Sensitive AES, DESede, DRBG and password-derived key material could remain in heap memory longer than intended because cleanup depended on Java finalization. 📅 Published: August 8, 2026. 🔎 Source: http://CVE.org / GitHub Advisory Database #CyberSecurity #Java #Cryptography #CVE #BouncyCastle

    Post summary

    The post announces CVE‑2026‑13505 affecting Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS, describing how crypto keys may linger in memory, but provides no exploit, PoC, or patch information.

    0000053
    34 followersView on X
  • SecNews@SecNews_GR
    General

    Bouncy Castle FIPS: Η CVE-2026-13505 καθυστερεί τη διαγραφή κλειδιών https://secn.ws/NjyLyV

    Post summary

    The post references CVE-2026-13505 in Bouncy Castle FIPS, noting it delays key deletion, but offers no further technical or exploit details.

    00000177
    7.0K followersView on X

Explore more