CVE-2026-45858General(linux / linux_kernel)

LOWCVSS 5.5 · MEDIUM

Signal is active with 1 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

  • Patch linux linux_kernel systems immediately

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

NVD description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 When allocating initialized blocks from a large unwritten extent, or when splitting an unwritten extent during end I/O and converting it to initialized, there is currently a potential issue of stale data if the extent needs to be split in the middle. 0 A B N [UUUUUUUUUUUU] U: unwritten extent [--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data |<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack of space. It zeroout B to N and mark the entire extent from 0 to N as written. 0 A B N [WWWWWWWWWWWW] W: written extent [SSDDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed, S: stale data ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and left a stale written extent from 0 to A. 0 A B N [WW|WWWWWWWWWW] [SS|DDDDDDDDZZ] Fix this by pass EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 to ext4_split_extent_at() when splitting at B, don't convert the entire extent to written and left it as unwritten after zeroing out B to N. The remaining work is just like the standard two-part split. ext4_split_extent() will pass the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag when it calls ext4_split_extent_at() for the second time, allowing it to properly handle the split. If the split is successful, it will keep extent from 0 to A as unwritten.

0.5/ 10 priority

Sources & remediation

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

AVAILABLE

Momentum

NONE

Are you affected?

If you run products in this scope, you should treat this CVE as relevant to your environment.

  • linux_kernel

Threat summary

  • Patch or workaround signal is available
  • 1 mentions across 1 observed day

What's happening

  • Patch or workaround mentioned in 1 signal
  • General: 1 classified signal
  • 1 total mentions across 1 day

Affected systems

Vendors
Products
linux_kernel

1 version affected across 1 product

Deep dive

Activity timeline1 mentions / 1d
00111Mentions · 2026-05-28: 1Patch / Workaround · 2026-05-28: 105-28
Signal classification1 categories
General
1100.0%
Referenced assets1 URL
Full discourse1 post
  • WindowsForum@windowsforum
    General

    🪟 ext4 “stale data exposure” is why filesystems don’t get to be comfy. Even if Windows isn’t the target, your Linux/WSL/NAS stack is. Patch fast, least-privilege forever. #Windows #Security #CVE https://windowsforum.com/threads/cve-2026-45858-ext4-bug-stale-data-exposure-and-what-windows-admins-should-do.420457/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=news_node84 #LinuxKernelSecurity #Ext4Vulnerability #StaleDataExposure https://t.co/WeByMn1oBU

    Post summary

    The tweet alerts to the ext4 stale data exposure CVE‑2026‑45858, urges a patch but offers no technical or exploit details, and links to a forum thread for additional discussion.

    0000031
    1.1K followersView on X
CPE platform detail8 entries

8 of 8 entries

PartVendorProductVersionTarget SWTarget HW
OSlinuxlinux_kernel---
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--
OSlinuxlinux_kernel3.7--

Explore more