CVE-2026-98432

LOWCVSS 9.8 · CRITICAL

Signal is active with 3 mentions in latest observed window

Immediate actions

  • Track advisory updates for patch or workaround availability

Recommended action window: Monitor and triage in normal cycle

NVD description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() transfers ownership of ireq->ireq_opt to the child socket (newinet->inet_opt) without copying it. Another cpu can concurrently process a retransmitted SYN for the same request socket, and send a SYNACK from tcp_check_req(). tcp_v4_send_synack() and inet_csk_route_req() read ireq->ireq_opt under rcu_read_lock() only, and ip_build_and_send_pkt() and ip_options_build() then read opt->optlen twice. Note that the SYNACK timer itself is not an issue: it holds a reference on its request socket, and inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop() calls timer_delete_sync() before the child can be freed. Since commit 079096f103fa ("tcp/dccp: install syn_recv requests into ehash table"), request sockets are processed without holding the listener lock, so nothing prevents the child socket from being freed while the SYNACK is still being built. TCP child sockets do not have SOCK_RCU_FREE, and inet_sock_destruct() frees inet_opt with a plain kfree(), leading to a use-after-free in ip_options_build(). A similar issue exists with request socket migration (net.ipv4.tcp_migrate_req=1, or a BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE program). reqsk_timer_handler() clones the request socket with inet_reqsk_clone(), so that the old request socket and its clone share the same ireq_opt, then reqsk_migrate_reset() clears the pointer in the old one. Another cpu holding a reference on the old request socket can still be using these options (sending a SYNACK, or creating a child in tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock()) when the clone is freed, and tcp_v4_reqsk_destructor() also uses a plain kfree(). Readers already use RCU, and other paths replacing inet_opt (do_ip_setsockopt(), cipso_v4_sock_setattr()...) already use kfree_rcu(). Use kfree_rcu() in inet_sock_destruct() and tcp_v4_reqsk_destructor() as well. IPv6 is not affected by the first issue, because tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() duplicates the options. tcp_v6_reqsk_destructor() has the same migration issue with ipv6_opt, which is only set by CALIPSO. This will be addressed in a separate patch.

0.0/ 10 priority

Sources & remediation

Priority

LOW

Exploitation

NONE

PoC

NONE

Patch

NONE

Momentum

STABLE

Threat summary

  • 4 mentions across 2 observed days
  • Momentum state: stable

What's happening

  • Peaked at 3 mentions on most recent observed day (2026-10-28)
  • 4 total mentions across 2 days

Deep dive

Activity timeline4 mentions / 2d
01223Mentions · 2026-10-27: 1Mentions · 2026-10-28: 310-2710-28
Referenced assets3 URLs
Full discourse4 posts
  • ZheFox@cyberestro

    Linux 零点击远程 root 代码执行 针对启用 multipath TCP 的服务器(CVE-2026-98432,已上游修复并回移植)。 竞态条件导致的 use-after-free:阶段 1:远程击败 KASLR,通过泄露内核指针获取地址空间布局(PoC 约 48 分钟)。 阶段 2:利用同一 UAF 溢出缓冲区,覆写回调指针,劫持控制流执行攻击者指定的 shell 命令(再约 5 分钟)。 失败的竞态不会崩溃,只是握手失败,可重试。 https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-vulnerabilities-with-claude

    27051276.1K
    913 followersView on X
  • OSS開発者@hacker_infra

    kernelのパッチみるとAlma8から影響しているな https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2026/CVE-2026-98432.mbox Linux kernel マルチパスTCPリスナーが有効な場合に影響を受ける https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-vulnerabilities-with-claude マルチパスTCPが無効なんで影響を受ける可能性は低い [root@alma8 redadmin]# sysctl -a |grep net.mptcp.enabled net.mptcp.enabled = 0 [root@alma8 redadmin]#

    01061540
    2.9K followersView on X
  • nrv@nervoir

    https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-vulnerabilities-with-claude Look at 5, demonstrated 0 click RCE in the Linux kernel ipv4 stack with non-crashing failure case allowing leak of KASLR. Ouch. Not familiar with the subsystem in detail but this looks pretty bad? https://www.tenable.com/cve/CVE-2026-98432

    00011259
    656 followersView on X
  • 嶋田大貴@shimarin

    CVE-2026-98432 ディストロベンダーによって評価が分かれてるみたいだけど、最近の流れだとエクスプロイトが出てもおかしくない。

    00000157
    4.7K followersView on X

Explore more